Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix minor panda update mistakes #494

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 4, 2025
Merged

Conversation

emdash-ie
Copy link
Contributor

@emdash-ie emdash-ie commented Jan 30, 2025

What does this change?

When recently updating panda to v7 in commit ce58764 (PR #489), I followed the example in https://github.com/guardian/tagmanager/pull/535/files#r1767036487 slightly too closely, replacing the use of the config key with a hard-coded string by mistake.

This PR restores the use of the config key, and removes a config key that that commit removed the only use of.

When recently updating panda to v7 in commit
ce58764, I followed the example in
https://github.com/guardian/tagmanager/pull/535/files#r1767036487
slightly too closely, replacing the use of the config key with a
hard-coded string by mistake.

This commit restores the use of the config key, and removes a config key
that that commit removed the only use of.
@emdash-ie emdash-ie requested a review from a team as a code owner January 30, 2025 16:36
Copy link
Contributor

@waisingyiu waisingyiu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you Emily, happy to approve.

@emdash-ie emdash-ie merged commit 64e6f09 into main Feb 4, 2025
3 checks passed
@emdash-ie emdash-ie deleted the fix-panda-update-mistakes branch February 4, 2025 11:54
@prout-bot
Copy link

Seen on WORKFLOW_PROD (merged by @emdash-ie 5 minutes and 18 seconds ago) Please check your changes!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants